Industries · Financial services

Every AI decision, ready for the examiner.

Your examiners already ask about AI. Meilynx enforces policy on every AI call your teams make and produces the evidence SR 26-2, FINRA 24-09, and NYDFS Part 500 ask for, from live traffic.

See a demo Request a sample examination package

Outcomes

Ready before the examiner asks.

SR 26-201

Know every model in use

A model inventory generated from traffic, with ownership and control mapping, current as teams adopt new models.

MNPI and PII02

Screen every prompt for MNPI and client data

Detection runs in the request path and blocks or flags a finding before the request leaves your perimeter. Findings are reported per team and provider.

FINRA 24-0903

Supervise AI-drafted communications

Supervisory reviews and approvals land in the same tamper-evident chain as the AI activity they cover.

Examination packages04

Show an examiner what the AI did, months later

Packages for SR 26-2, NYDFS 500, FINRA 24-09, PRA SS1/23, and SOC 2, built from the record. The SR 26-2 package includes an FS AI RMF crosswalk.

Proof

Evidence your reviewers can check.

Request a sample examination package

Audit

SOC 2 Type I

Report issued for Security, Availability, and Confidentiality. The Type II observation period is underway.

Verification

Open-source verifier

Reviewers check the audit chain themselves, offline, with no Meilynx system in the loop.

Coverage

8 frameworks

Each ships as a preset, with a control mapping and the examination package it produces.

Isolation

Single-tenant

An isolated data plane for each organization, in every deployment mode.

Trust Center →How verification works →

Frameworks that apply

NYDFS 500 FINRA 24-09 SR 26-2 EU AI Act ISO/IEC 42001 DORA PRA SS1/23 SOC 2

For the CCO For the CISO Head of Model Risk For the CFO

FAQ

Common questions.

Which financial-services frameworks ship as presets?

SR 26-2, NYDFS 23 NYCRR 500, FINRA 24-09, SOC 2 Type II, EU AI Act, DORA, ISO/IEC 42001, and PRA SS1/23 (for UK banks with internal model approval) ship as curated control bundles. Each has a framework page with the control mapping and the artifact it produces.

We are a fintech without a bank charter. Does this still apply?

Usually through your partners and your state regulators. Bank partners pass SR 26-2 and third-party risk expectations down through contracts, NYDFS Part 500 applies to licensed entities, and FINRA rules apply if you hold a broker-dealer. The evidence is the same either way.

How does Meilynx fit with our GRC platform?

Meilynx produces the runtime evidence your GRC platform and your examiners consume: what the AI did, which controls applied, and a record that can be verified independently.

How does the SR 26-2 package handle the FS AI RMF?

It carries a crosswalk with all 72 FS AI RMF subcategories classified by where their evidence comes from.

Reference

FINRA Regulatory Notice 24-09: Generative AI Compliance ObligationsThe supervision, recordkeeping, and communications obligations that attach when member firms use generative AI and LLMs, and what examiners expect to see.FINRA 2026 Oversight Report: GenAI and AI Agent ExpectationsFINRA's 2026 Oversight Report on generative AI and AI agents: the rules it cites, the practices it describes, and the records a member firm keeps.SEC Rule 17a-4 and Advisers Act Rule 204-2: Recordkeeping for AIWhich AI outputs, prompts, notetaker transcripts and agent actions become books and records under SEA Rule 17a-4 and Advisers Act Rule 204-2, how long each is kept, and in what form.SR 26-2 Explained: The Model Risk Guidance Replacing SR 11-7What SR 26-2 requires, how it differs from SR 11-7, why generative and agentic AI sit outside it, and where supervisors still act. Fed, OCC, FDIC, April 2026.OCC Bulletin 2026-13: Model Risk Management Guidance for BanksWhat OCC Bulletin 2026-13, Model Risk Management: Revised Guidance, applies to, the four OCC issuances it rescinds, how it relates to SR 26-2, and the AI request for information still to come.23 NYCRR 500.13: Asset Management and Data RetentionWhat NYDFS Section 500.13 requires for asset inventory and secure disposal of nonpublic information, who it binds, and what examiners expect to see.NYDFS Industry Letter on Frontier AI Models and Cybersecurity Risk (21 May 2026)What the NYDFS advisory of 21 May 2026 on frontier AI models asks of regulated entities, its companion guidance, and how it sits within Part 500.DORA and AI Workloads: What Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 RequiresWhat DORA has required of EU financial entities since 17 January 2025, and how its ICT risk, incident, and third-party obligations reach an AI workload.What a Bank's Third-Party Risk Review Asks an AI VendorThe questions a bank asks an AI vendor under the interagency third-party guidance and SR 26-2, and the evidence that answers each one.

Get started

See the evidence on your own traffic

A 15-minute walkthrough of inline enforcement, the audit chain, and the examination package.