Industry · Financial services
AI compliance for banks, broker-dealers, and fintechs.
Your examiners already ask about AI. SR 26-2 expects generative AI governed under model risk principles, FINRA 24-09 applies supervision and recordkeeping rules to it, and NYDFS Part 500 covers the systems it runs on. Meilynx produces the evidence each of those asks for, from live traffic.
Four questions every financial services examiner asks about AI.
Examination is the reflex. These are the requests the evidence has to answer.
01
A current model inventory
Which models are in use, by which teams, through which providers. An inventory missing a model in use undermines every other control.
02
Supervision and books and records
FINRA expects AI-drafted communications supervised and retained like any other. Books and records rules do not care that a model wrote the draft.
03
A record of what the AI did
Who sent what, what came back, which policy applied, and who reviewed it. Reconstructed after the fact, or produced as the system runs.
04
Controls that map to named rules
Examiners work from the rule, not from a vendor's feature list. Each control has to point at the requirement it satisfies.
Named regulations, with a control mapping for each.
Presets ship in the product for each framework below. Each page walks the requirement, the Meilynx control, and the artifact.
Evidence in your regulator's vocabulary.
Meilynx evidences the LLM and agent traffic that runs through it. Statistical model validation, written policies, and regulatory filings stay with your model risk and compliance functions.
In the package
- Model inventory generated from traffic, with ownership and control mapping
- MNPI and PII detection findings per team and provider
- Supervisory review and approval records in the same tamper-evident chain
- Examination packages for SR 26-2, NYDFS 500, FINRA 24-09, and SOC 2
Who we work with
Who reads the evidence
Financial services and the proxy.
Which financial-services frameworks ship as presets?
SR 26-2, NYDFS 23 NYCRR 500, FINRA 24-09, SOC 2 Type II, EU AI Act, DORA, and ISO/IEC 42001 ship as curated control bundles. Each has a framework page with the control mapping and the artifact it produces.
We are a fintech without a bank charter. Does this still apply?
Usually through your partners and your state regulators. Bank partners pass SR 26-2 and third-party risk expectations down through contracts, NYDFS Part 500 applies to licensed entities, and FINRA rules apply if you hold a broker-dealer. The evidence is the same either way.
Does Meilynx replace our GRC platform?
No. It produces the runtime evidence your GRC platform and your examiners consume: what the AI did, which controls applied, and a record that can be verified independently.
See the evidence on your own traffic
A 15-minute walkthrough of inline enforcement, the audit chain, and the examination package.