meilynx

Platform

End-to-end AI compliance,
from prompt to examiner.

Meilynx is the compliance system of record for AI in financial services. One system enforces policy, governs agents, and produces examination-ready evidence — so the compliance budget buys one coherent audit trail, not a stitched-together stack.

audit chain · prompt → examiner
  • seq 1042
    Request sealedprompt · policy context
  • seq 1043
    Decision sealedPII rule · redacted
  • seq 1044
    Response sealedtokens · cost · outcome

→ Examination package

hash-linked · WORM archive · examiner-verifiable

Why Meilynx

One system, not four.

A mid-sized finance team shouldn't buy a model gateway, a DLP tool, an audit pipeline, and a model-inventory spreadsheet — then try to make them tell one story to an examiner.

Model gateway

routes, proves nothing

DLP tool

sees files, not prompts

Audit pipeline

logs, not evidence

Inventory spreadsheet

stale by exam day

The system of record

Meilynx

One system enforces policy, governs agents, and produces the examination-ready evidence — the layer that proves what your AI did, who governed it, and what backs the claim.

How it works

One position in the data path.

A single env-var change routes LLM traffic through the Meilynx proxy. From that one position it enforces policy pre-request and post-response, seals every decision into the audit chain, and attributes spend — while raw prompts and responses never leave your perimeter.

Meilynx Proxy · Inside your perimeter

Request

From your application

Policy

Model allow/deny · schema

PII / MNPI

Real-time detection

Cost

Per-request · budgets

Tools

Agent allow/deny

Provider

OpenAI · Anthropic · Azure · Google

Audit trail

Analytical store · WORM archive · Cryptographic hash chain

Capturing every call · 6-year floor (Fully Managed)

Shadow mode supported for safe rollout.

Rollout

Deployed in a day, examined on your schedule.

Fully Managed deploys in about a day; self-hosted in one to two weeks. Either way, the path from first request to examination package is the same three steps.

01

Change one env var

Point your LLM base URL at the proxy. No SDK swap, no app rewrite — traffic flows through the data path the same day.

02

Publish policies

Start from framework presets, draft in shadow mode, then publish signed bundles your compliance team can read.

03

Export evidence

The audit chain accumulates from the first request. Export a curated examination package whenever an examiner asks.

Architecture

Isolation is the architecture.

Not a configuration setting — the deployment topology itself.

  • A per-customer isolated data plane in every deployment mode — your data never shares a boundary with another institution's.
  • Raw prompts and responses never leave your perimeter; only hashed, aggregate metadata reaches the shared control plane.
  • The data plane owns your audit trail — tamper-evident, WORM-archived, examiner-verifiable.

Deployment modes

See the trust boundary and per-mode matrix

Who operates what in Fully Managed and Self-Hosted — and the isolation invariant that holds in both.

Framework coverage

Controls that map to named regulations.

Not generic compliance — controls that map directly to the frameworks a financial-services examiner asks about.

SR 11-7NYDFS 23 NYCRR 500FINRA 24-09SOC 2 Type II
See control mappings per framework
By the numbers

Built for the data path.

Added latency

<1ms

Built-in regex, token, and schema checks at the data path

LLM providers

4live

OpenAI · Anthropic · Google · Azure OpenAI

Retention floor

6yr

Fully Managed production, per FINRA 24-09

Change to deploy

1env var

No SDK swap, no app rewrite

Get started

See it on your own traffic

A 15-minute walkthrough of inline enforcement, the audit chain, and the examination package.

Response within 1 business day