Reference · Insurance
NAIC Model Bulletin on the Use of AI by Insurers, Explained
Model Bulletin: Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems by Insurers
The NAIC Model Bulletin sets out how state insurance regulators expect insurers to govern the AI systems that make or support regulated decisions. The NAIC adopted it on 4 December 2023.NAIC Model Bulletin · p. 1 A bulletin takes effect in a state when that state's insurance department issues it, and the NAIC's map, status as of 8 October 2026, shows it adopted in 29 jurisdictions: 27 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. California, Colorado, New York and Texas govern insurer AI through their own insurance-specific rules.NAIC map
The bulletin applies insurance law insurers already follow
The bulletin creates no new statute. It tells insurers how the department reads the laws it already enforces when a decision is made or supported by AI: the Unfair Trade Practices Act, the Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act, the Corporate Governance Annual Disclosure Act and its regulation, the Property and Casualty Model Rating Law, and the Market Conduct Surveillance Model Law.NAIC Model Bulletin · Section 1 Those laws require decisions that are not inaccurate, arbitrary, capricious or unfairly discriminatory, and compliance is required "regardless of the tools and methods" an insurer uses.NAIC Model Bulletin · Section 3
It is addressed to every insurer licensed in the adopting state. The program it expects is tailored to and proportionate with the insurer's use of and reliance on AI, and its controls follow the degree of potential harm to consumers.NAIC Model Bulletin · Section 3, 1.4
29 jurisdictions have adopted it, four of them in 2026
The table lists every jurisdiction the NAIC's implementation map shows as having adopted the bulletin, with the instrument and date the map cites. Twenty-three issued a bulletin; six used a commissioner memorandum, guidance document, notice, administrative letter, technical assistance advisory or ruling letter. The most recent adoptions are Puerto Rico on 11 June 2026, Mississippi on 22 July 2026, South Carolina on 24 September 2026 and North Dakota on 5 October 2026. The remaining 19 states show no action on the map.NAIC map
Adoption counts published elsewhere vary with their cut-off date and with how they treat the four states in the next section. This page follows the NAIC map alone.
Bars
Jurisdictions adopting the NAIC bulletin, by year and in total
| State | Adopted as | Date | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alaska | Bulletin B 24-01 | 1 February 2024 | First state to adopt. |
| Arkansas | Bulletin 13-2024 | 31 July 2024 | |
| Connecticut | Bulletin MC-25 | 26 February 2024 | Adds an annual AI certification from each domestic insurer. |
| Delaware | Domestic and Foreign Bulletin No. 148 | 5 February 2025 | |
| District of Columbia | Bulletin 24-IB-002-05/21 | 21 May 2024 | |
| Hawaii | Insurance Commissioner Memorandum No. 2025-13A | 10 December 2025 | Issued as a commissioner memorandum. |
| Illinois | Company Bulletin 2024-08 | 13 March 2024 | |
| Iowa | Insurance Division Bulletin 24-04 | 7 November 2024 | |
| Kentucky | Bulletin No. 2024-02 | 16 April 2024 | |
| Maryland | Bulletin No. 24-11 | 22 April 2024 | |
| Massachusetts | Bulletin No. 2024-10 | 9 December 2024 | |
| Michigan | Bulletin 2024-20-INS | 7 August 2024 | |
| Mississippi | Bulletin 2026-9 | 22 July 2026 | |
| Nebraska | Insurance Guidance Document IGD-H1 | 11 June 2024 | Issued as an insurance guidance document. |
| Nevada | Bulletin 24-001 | 23 February 2024 | |
| New Hampshire | Bulletin Docket INS 24-011-AB | 20 February 2024 | |
| New Jersey | Insurance Bulletin No. 25-03 | 11 February 2025 | |
| North Carolina | Bulletin No. 24-B-19 | 18 December 2024 | |
| North Dakota | Bulletin 2026-2 | 5 October 2026 | Most recent adoption on the map. |
| Oklahoma | Bulletin No. 2024-11 | 14 November 2024 | |
| Pennsylvania | Insurance Notice 2024-04, 54 Pa.B. 1910 | 6 April 2024 | Published as a notice in the Pennsylvania Bulletin. |
| Puerto Rico | Ruling Letter CN-2026-382-D | 11 June 2026 | Issued as a ruling letter. |
| Rhode Island | Insurance Bulletin No. 2024-03 | 15 March 2024 | |
| South Carolina | Bulletin 2026-07 | 24 September 2026 | |
| Vermont | Insurance Bulletin No. 229 | 12 March 2024 | |
| Virginia | Administrative Letter 2024-01 | 22 July 2024 | Issued as an administrative letter. |
| Washington | Technical Assistance Advisory 2024-02 | 22 April 2024 | Issued as a technical assistance advisory. |
| West Virginia | Insurance Bulletin No. 24-06 | 9 August 2024 | |
| Wisconsin | Insurance Bulletin | 18 March 2025 |
Four states govern insurer AI through their own rules
The NAIC map places four states in a separate category, insurance-specific regulation or guidance.NAIC map Each reaches insurer use of AI or external consumer data through its own instrument, with its own scope.
- California: Bulletin 2022-5 of 30 June 2022 addresses racial bias and unfair discrimination in marketing, rating, underwriting and claims practices, including bias that can result from artificial intelligence and other forms of big data.CDI Bulletin 2022-5
- Colorado: Regulation 10-1-1 (3 CCR 702-10) has applied to life insurers since 14 November 2023 and, as amended effective 15 October 2025, to private passenger auto and health benefit plan insurers that use external consumer data. It requires a governance framework available on request and an annual report signed by an officer.3 CCR 702-10 · Sections 3, 5, 6
- New York: DFS Insurance Circular Letter No. 7 of 11 July 2024 covers AI systems and external consumer data and information sources in underwriting and pricing.DFS Circular Letter 7
- Texas: the map cites Bulletin B-0036-20 of 30 September 2020, which holds regulated entities responsible for the accuracy of data used in rating, underwriting and claims handling, even when a third party supplies it.TDI B-0036-20 The Department's Bulletin B-0003-26 of 12 June 2026, which the map does not yet list, sets its expectations for AI: where a regulated entity uses AI to make a consequential decision, the Department expects a person to review and agree with all decisions before action is taken.TDI B-0003-26
Section 3 requires a written AIS Program
Every insurer is expected to develop, implement and maintain a written program for the responsible use of AI Systems that make or support decisions related to regulated insurance practices, the AIS Program.NAIC Model Bulletin · Section 3 Its guidelines cover:
- Accountability: senior management accountable to the board or an appropriate board committee.NAIC Model Bulletin · Section 3, 1.3
- Scope: AI Systems across the insurance life cycle, from product development and design, marketing, underwriting, rating and pricing to case management, claim administration and payment, and fraud detection, whether the insurer built them or a third-party vendor did.NAIC Model Bulletin · Section 3, 1.6, 1.8
- Governance: committees drawn from the relevant disciplines, with monitoring, auditing, escalation and reporting protocols and ongoing training and supervision of personnel.NAIC Model Bulletin · Section 3, 2.3
- Risk management and internal controls: an approval process, data practices covering lineage, quality and bias analysis, inventories, documentation and drift assessment of predictive models, validation and testing, protection of non-public information, and record retention.NAIC Model Bulletin · Section 3, 3.1 to 3.6
- Third parties: due diligence on AI Systems and data acquired from others and, where appropriate and available, contract terms that give audit rights and require cooperation with regulatory inquiries.NAIC Model Bulletin · Section 3, 4.1 to 4.3
- Consumer notice: telling impacted consumers that AI Systems are in use.NAIC Model Bulletin · Section 3, 1.9
Section 4 is the examiner's request list
Section 4 lists what a department may request in an investigation or market conduct examination: the written program and evidence of its adoption; evidence that it is implemented and followed; inventories and descriptions of the predictive models and AI Systems that can result in adverse consumer outcomes; the data sources, provenance, lineage, techniques and thresholds behind a system; validation and testing records, including evaluation of model drift, whether a system is built on predictive models or generative AI; and the diligence, contracts and audits for third-party systems.NAIC Model Bulletin · Section 4
Life and annuity insurers run the same program
The bulletin has no separate provision for life or annuity business; it applies to every insurer licensed in an adopting state.NAIC Model Bulletin For a life or annuity carrier, its legal anchors are the Unfair Trade Practices Act, the Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act, the corporate governance annual disclosure rules and the market conduct surveillance law. The Property and Casualty Model Rating Law it also cites reaches property and casualty rates only.NAIC Model Bulletin · Section 1
The AIS Program covers AI Systems used in product development and design, marketing, underwriting, rating and pricing, case management, claim administration and payment, and fraud detection, whether the insurer built them or bought them.NAIC Model Bulletin · Section 3, 1.6, 1.8 For a life or annuity carrier's systems, Section 3 expects:
- Governance: senior management accountable to the board, a committee drawing on actuarial, underwriting, claims, data science, compliance and legal, and documented monitoring, escalation and training protocols.NAIC Model Bulletin · Section 3, 1.3, 2.3
- Risk management: an approval process before an AI System is used, data lineage and bias analysis for the data behind underwriting and pricing, inventories and documentation of predictive models, validation and drift assessment, protection of non-public consumer information, and record retention.NAIC Model Bulletin · Section 3, 3.1 to 3.6
- Third-party AI: diligence on the vendors behind underwriting data, scoring engines and generative AI tools, with audit rights and regulator cooperation in contracts where appropriate and available.NAIC Model Bulletin · Section 3, 4.1 to 4.3
- Consumer notice: processes that tell impacted consumers AI Systems are in use, with information suited to the phase of the insurance life cycle.NAIC Model Bulletin · Section 3, 1.9
Life and annuity carriers face the same examination, and Colorado adds a layer
Section 4 applies to life and annuity carriers as written. An examiner can request the written program and evidence it was adopted and operates; the inventory of predictive models and AI Systems that can result in adverse consumer outcomes; the data sources, techniques and thresholds behind a specific system; validation, testing and drift records; and the diligence, contracts and audits for third-party systems.NAIC Model Bulletin · Section 4 An AI System that supports annuity sales, marketing or servicing sits in the same program.
Colorado's Regulation 10-1-1 has applied to individually issued life insurance since 14 November 2023. It requires a governance and risk management framework aimed at unfair discrimination with respect to race, a version-controlled inventory of external consumer data sources, algorithms and predictive models, a description of the quantitative testing conducted, the framework available on request since 1 December 2024, and an annual compliance report signed by an officer and filed in SERFF. For life insurers, its definition of external consumer data adds occupation without a direct relationship to mortality, morbidity or longevity risk.3 CCR 702-10 · Sections 4.D, 5, 6
Control mapping
What a reviewer expects to be able to see.
| Obligation | What the system must do | Evidence a reviewer expects |
|---|---|---|
| AI System inventory | Maintain a current inventory of AI Systems that make or support regulated decisions, with the third-party providers behind them | Inventory with system purpose, decision type, degree-of-harm tier, and provider |
| Written AIS Program | Adopt a written program with board-level accountability and proportionate controls | The program document, its adoption record, and evidence it operates |
| Non-public information | Control what consumer data reaches an AI System and what comes back | Data-flow records and detection findings per system |
| Change control | Detect unapproved changes to a deployed system and show the approved controls were in force | Configuration history, drift findings, and enforcement records |
| Testing and validation | Test for unfair discrimination and document validation of predictive models | Testing methodology, results, and remediation records |
| Third-party diligence | Contract for audit rights and regulator cooperation with AI and data vendors | Contracts, diligence files, and vendor documentation |
Key dates
Timeline, drawn to scale
From the NAIC bulletin to 29 adoptions
- 30 September 2020Texas issues Bulletin B-0036-20 on third-party data.
- 30 June 2022California issues Bulletin 2022-5 on bias in AI and big data.
- 4 December 2023NAIC adopts the Model Bulletin.
- 1 February 2024Alaska becomes the first state to adopt the bulletin.
- 26 February 2024Connecticut issues Bulletin MC-25 with an annual AI certification.
- 11 July 2024New York DFS issues Circular Letter No. 7 on AI in underwriting and pricing.
- 15 October 2025Colorado's amended Regulation 10-1-1 takes effect.
- 11 June 2026Puerto Rico adopts the bulletin.
- 12 June 2026Texas issues Bulletin B-0003-26 on AI.
- 1 July 2026Colorado Regulation 10-1-1 reaches private passenger auto and health benefit plans.
- 22 July 2026Mississippi adopts the bulletin.
- 24 September 2026South Carolina adopts the bulletin.
- 5 October 2026North Dakota adopts the bulletin.
- 8 October 2026NAIC map shows the bulletin adopted in 29 jurisdictions: 27 states, DC and Puerto Rico.
Sources cited
- ×21NAIC Model Bulletin: Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems by Insurers (adopted text, PDF)
- ×3NAIC, Implementation of NAIC Model Bulletin (PDF, status as of 8 October 2026)
- ×1California Department of Insurance Bulletin 2022-5 (30 June 2022, PDF)
- ×23 CCR 702-10, Colorado Regulation 10-1-1, as amended effective 15 October 2025 (Code of Colorado Regulations, PDF)
- ×1New York DFS Insurance Circular Letter No. 7 (11 July 2024)
- ×1Texas Department of Insurance Bulletin B-0036-20 (30 September 2020)
- ×1Texas Department of Insurance Bulletin B-0003-26, Use of artificial intelligence (12 June 2026)
- ×1Connecticut Insurance Department Bulletin MC-25 (26 February 2024, PDF)
Common gaps
Where insurers most often struggle when examined against the bulletin.
- An inventory built from a survey. Inventories assembled by asking business units miss the chatbot a team switched on last quarter. Examiners find it in the complaint file.
- A program with no operating evidence. A written AIS Program answers the first Section 4 request. The next is for evidence that it is implemented and followed, and a policy document cannot supply that.
- Generative AI treated as out of scope. The bulletin defines generative AI, and Section 4 asks for testing records whether a system is built on predictive models or generative AI. A servicing assistant that summarizes a claim file supports a regulated decision.
- Vendor contracts without audit rights. A model provider is a third party under the bulletin's definition. Standard API terms rarely include the audit and regulatory-cooperation terms Section 3 expects where appropriate and available.
- State layers tracked separately. Connecticut's domestic insurers certify each year by 1 September,CID Bulletin MC-25 Colorado asks for its framework on request and an annual report, and Texas expects a person to agree with a consequential AI decision before it is acted on. Organizations that track the bulletin alone miss the layers.
In practice
Related
Last reviewed October 11, 2026. This reference summarises publicly available regulatory guidance and is provided for general information. It is not legal advice. Obligations depend on an institution's charter, registration status, size, and activities. Verify against the primary sources cited above and consult counsel before relying on any summary here.