Design Partner ProgramWe're accepting applications for the next cohort of design partners in finance, insurance, healthcare, and HR. Apply now →

meilynx

For security reviewers

Raw prompts never leave your boundary.

The architecture, isolation model and comparison your security and vendor risk teams ask for. Your data plane runs in infrastructure dedicated to your organization and owns the audit trail.

Architecture

Two planes. One trust boundary.

Your data plane runs in single-tenant infrastructure dedicated to you, and it owns the audit trail. The shared control plane distributes hash-pinned policy bundles and receives hashed metadata, never raw payload.

Your environment

Managed or self-hosted · isolated either way

Trust boundary
  • Application

    Your apps & agents

  • Meilynx Proxy

    Validators · streaming · audit emission

  • Audit Trail

    WORM archive · hash chain · examination export

Raw prompts & responses never leave this boundary.

Per-customer isolated data plane in every deployment mode

Telemetry

metadata

Bundles

policy-as-code

Meilynx control plane

Managed SaaS

  • Policy authoring

    Versioned bundles · policy-as-code

  • Compliance console

    Posture · waivers · examination packages

  • Telemetry rollup

    Metadata only · token counts · rule outcomes

No raw payload data ever reaches the control plane.

Single-tenant by design

Dedicated infrastructure for every customer and environment.

No shared data plane, no pooled storage, no other institution's traffic in your boundary. Fully Managed, Self-Hosted or Sovereign, the isolation is the same; the difference is who runs the infrastructure.

Dimension

Fully Managed

Meilynx operates per-customer infrastructure · ~1 day

Self-Hosted

Customer operates the proxy and storage

Sovereign

Customer operates everything, disconnected

Control plane

Meilynx

Live

Meilynx

Live

Customer, inside your boundary

Per engagement
Connection to Meilynx

Policy pull and metadata only

Live

Policy pull and metadata only

Live

None

Per engagement
WORM immutability

Retention-locked object storage

Live

Customer-managed object storage

Customer

Your object storage, write-once

Per engagement
Retention floor

6 yr prod · 30 d staging · 1 d test (FINRA 24-09)

Live

Customer-set (proxy default: 90 d)

Customer

Customer-set

Customer
Encryption at rest

AES-256-GCM + per-customer CMEK

Live

Customer-managed

Customer

Your KMS or HSM

Per engagement
Integrity Pack

Included

Live

Customer-operated

Customer

Signed with a key you hold

Per engagement
Verification surface

Hash chain · examiner-verifiable

Live

Hash chain · customer-operated

Customer

Hash chain · verified offline against your trust root

Per engagement
Time evidence

RFC 3161 timestamps from two independent authorities

Live

Public timestamp authorities, or your own

Customer

Your own timestamp authority

Per engagement
Cryptography

TLS 1.2 or later in transit

Live

TLS 1.2 or later in transit

Customer

FIPS 140-3 validated cryptography

Per engagement
Proxy operated by

Meilynx

Live

Customer

Customer

Customer

Customer

Time evidence: a timestamp over the audit chain shows that the anchored records existed by the stated time and are unchanged since. Records written after the latest anchor, and the completeness of the record set, are outside what a timestamp attests.

Proxy source code is available to customers for review under mutual NDA.

Deployment modes

By the numbers

Added latency, p95

<0ms

Measured under sustained load, October 2026

Requests in the load test

0.0M

August 2026 campaign, zero failures

Retention floor

0yr

Write-once archive in Fully Managed production, per FINRA 24-09

Change to deploy

0env var

No SDK swap and no rewrite. About a day managed; self-hosted in your environment

How it compares

Examiner-grade evidence from live traffic.

Meilynx enforces policy inline and keeps a record an examiner can verify on their own. The table compares it with the tools security teams already run.

CapabilityMeilynxDLP / CASBSIEM / log exportBuild it yourself
Enforces policy inline, before the call leaves your perimeterYesPartialPartial
Reads prompt and response content, including PII and MNPIYesPartialPartial
Write-once, tamper-evident record rather than a log exportYes
Curated examination packages per frameworkYes
Integrity an outside auditor can re-verify on their ownYes
Detects agent drift and gates high-risk actions behind a second approverYesPartial
Single-tenant data plane per customer and environment, never pooled with another institutionYesPartial

A category comparison, not a product-by-product rebuttal. Most tools can log what your AI did. The rows below the first two are where examination evidence gets produced, or does not.

You can check the record yourself. An examiner or your own auditor can recompute the hash chain with an open verifier at any time. The proof does not depend on trusting Meilynx.

Independent verification
Get started

Bring your security questionnaire

A 15-minute walkthrough of the architecture, the isolation model and the audit trail, with your security team in the room.

Regulatory updates

When a regulator changes what an AI examination asks for, hear about it first.

Short notes on SR 26-2, NYDFS 500, FINRA, the NAIC bulletin, the EU AI Act, and the employment-AI statutes, plus what we ship. A few emails a month.